Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 24.06.2025 12:43
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Thank you.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
ESA signs agreement for potential use of Orbital Reef - SpaceNews
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Just in the last 5 years:
Does anybody believe in cultural appropriation?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Why was Nietzsche against essentialism?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Nintendo has replaced the longtime voice of Peach and Toad - Polygon
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
What is the most eccentric thing you own? How did you get it?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Xbox finally reveals handheld console after decade of speculation - BBC
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
What’s next?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
All international travelers should get measles vaccinations, CDC says - AP News